New: SEO & AEO scanning — see how Google ranks you and how ChatGPT, Claude & Perplexity cite youSee how it works
Cascade builds whole features autonomously. Audit what it shipped.
Apps shipped from Windsurf are as secure as the prompts and reviews behind them. Cascade's multi-file autonomy means more code lands per session than you read — the recurring gaps are unreviewed auth logic, secrets in config files, missing input validation, and absent security headers. Scan the deployed app after each session.
Windsurf's Cascade agent writes and edits across your whole codebase autonomously — it will scaffold auth, wire a database, and deploy in one flow. That autonomy is the risk: more generated code per session than most developers actually review, touching exactly the files where security bugs live. The fix isn't reading every diff; it's verifying the deployed result from the outside.
Get a graded security report for your Windsurf app in under a minute.
Cascade can scaffold an entire auth flow in one task. If you didn't review the session-expiry, redirect validation, and role checks, nobody did. CheckVibe probes auth endpoints for enumeration, brute-force exposure, and bypass patterns.
Agent-generated `.env`, Docker, and deploy files sometimes carry real keys into the repo or the client bundle. We scan your live assets for 30+ key shapes.
Multi-file agents reuse whatever query style the codebase started with — including string interpolation. CheckVibe probes inputs with benign payloads.
Agent sessions leave `/api/test`, verbose error handlers, and console dumps behind. We enumerate 200+ debug paths.
No CSP, HSTS, or frame protection unless explicitly requested from the agent.
"Review the changes in this session for auth gaps, unparameterized queries, exposed secrets, and missing input validation" — the agent is good at fixing what it's told to look for.
The diff is too big to review; the deployed app isn't. CheckVibe runs 100+ external checks in about 30 seconds.
Use your platform's secret manager (Vercel/Netlify env vars, not files in the repo) so generated configs can't embed real values.
One Cascade task each: "add security headers middleware", "rate-limit all public API routes". They won't appear otherwise.
Securing the app is half the job — the other half is making it visible. AI engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity) only cite what their crawlers can read.
Windsurf executes multi-file tasks well — use that: "add unique metadata to every route, robots.txt allowing GPTBot/OAI-SearchBot/ClaudeBot/PerplexityBot/Google-Extended, sitemap.xml, llms.txt, and Organization JSON-LD." One session, whole layer.
If Cascade scaffolded a client-only SPA, AI engines can't read it — fetch your URL with a bot user-agent and check whether real content comes back. Prerender or move to SSR if not.
Open each public page with a direct ≤50-word answer to the question it targets, add FAQ blocks with FAQPage schema, and show a visible updated date.
CheckVibe's 68 SEO + 46 AEO checks return findings as paste-ready fix prompts — feed them straight back into Cascade.
Deep dives: how to rank a vibe-coded SPA in AI search · AEO for vibe-coded apps · best AEO tools compared
Yes — Windsurf itself isn't the risk. The risk is shipping more agent-written code per session than you review. Verify the deployed result with an external scan instead of trying to read every diff.
Unreviewed authorization logic — Cascade scaffolds auth flows fast, and gaps in session handling, redirects, or role checks ship silently. Exposed secrets in generated config files are a close second.
Cascade reviews what you ask it to review. There's no automatic external audit of the deployed app — that's what a scanner is for.
Yes. CheckVibe scans the deployed URL — no repo access needed — and outputs findings as fix prompts you can paste back into Cascade.
